WOMAN: GUILTY AS CHARGED

I have written once of a magazine wherein (in the very same edition) a man was referred to as a "notorious homosexual," whilst a lesbian was described with a word like unto "glamorous."

I have written also of how Man in sin is wickedness; whilst Woman in sin, wantoness. And I have further clarified this fact by stating that The Man is weak and dead (and thereby wea(k)ead) whilst The Woman, in the shoes of the emasculated man - and thereby imbued with all the wantoness that would be his lot; were he not (even though emasculated) with the toil that is the heritage of The Man even then encouraged, or imposed: the toil that those privy to The Truth that is The Ikoro will know (when with an iota of Wisdom between their ears) will bring a good reward only when neither of the two that are better than one is of she whose heart is snairs and nets, and whose hands are fetters; she of whom not one was found deserving of that which Solomon repeatedly sought.

I have written also of how the lesbian has her sexual proclivities condoned by cultures not as favourably disposed to homosexuality in men; only because Man is rarely ever a coward - and Woman, almost always cowardly enough to ever "beg" for her wants; be it with bent, or parted knees. Thus the bisexual that the lesbian always is. And thus the age-old persecution of the homosexual; for, even though emasculated, he almost always fights for his wants - be it indeed right, or need. And I have to once more state (even if not with the same words) that the bisexuality of the brutes and the savages that saith of sojourners,

"Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them."

that barbaric heterosexuality that struts its power even when conquering a man with its phallus; is not the same as the sexuality that has a man cleave to a man, to be even one flesh - rather than be on his own when he falls, with no other to lift him up. And for The Fool that with his characteristic Folly will even then argue against homosexuality, only when male; I urge him to blind his eyes with logs, and have be his guide one with eyes equally blinded by logs. He may then fall into the same pit he would the man fall that has been emasculated into being a weaker vessel.

Being Fool with a capital "F for Failure," he may continue to believe he will not thus fall.

I will shed more light now on the wickedness that I say is it mostly that has a man fall into sin, even as wantoness is it mostly that has a woman fall into sin. The wickedness that Woman (be she supposedly virtuous, or definitely harlot; be the ward under her male, or - as she most often would it be - female, even when male) laughs The Fool into pounding his chest over; as he struts his power over all the stronger vessels he has to, or has actually killed for her.

The fourth of May, 2015; and the following words appeared in The Nigerian Guardian, credited to a certain Ifeanyi Okorie:

"My parents' death pushed me into crime."

On the very same day, the following words appeared in The Nigerian Tribune; credited to a certain Gabriel Owilo,

"Our children have become prostitutes to feed....

"The untold hardship has lured many female children into cheap prostitution."

I have said once before that there are a lot of other alternatives to a woman in dire straits apart from prostitution. And I'll now have to add: an equal number of other alternatives, at the very least, are open to a man in dire straits; apart from crime. But a man will always prefer the crime; whilst a woman, the prostitution: and obviously because of that which I have stated for years....

Iranu ni ti obinrin. Ika ni ti okunrin.

Only when emasculated does a man become so imbued with the iranu that is wantoness; that he considers then the path trod by such as fairies, in the days when homosexuality in The Man was not as condoned as it is today: Fairies being then they that would seal their homosexuality with such effeminacy that (be it with clothes, or cosmetics, or more, or worse) theirs was either the obvious whore-nest that sells his body to any; or the honest that sells it only to one, that then has to shield him from others who would the body be even then theirs.

When The Woman is honest, she will consider herself to be wanton - and no worse: as has been testified to by her very own tongue, on so many occasions; be she then the tart that makes with clothes adorned a statement she dare not make with word, or the retart that would The Fool believe romantic novels are nowhere near being in absolutely any way whatsoever pornography. When she is whore-nest, she will know herself to be whore - and give as her excuse for the vice that which she never grants The Man as excuse: she was in dire straits. Thus, she had to sell her "money-maker." But The Man, regardless of how dire the straits he may be in, must never plunder her. Or so The Fool would thou know that has the rights of The Woman be given such unprecedented priority over that of The Man, that the United Nations Population Fund (U.N.F.P.A.) states as one of its aims to ensure that "every pregnancy is wanted, every birth is safe, every young person is free of H.I.V. and sexually transmitted diseases, and every girl and woman is treated with dignity and respect."

That "every pregnancy is wanted, every birth is safe;" and that therefore The Woman may thereby be given the right to indulge in all the pleasure that has hers be not depravity only when deprived: the pleasure for which longs the wantoness due to which is all that which The LORD GOD has as punishment for Eve - the delight to the eyes, and to even more of the senses; being the temptation for which The Woman falls into transgression, even till this very day.

And thus, when "every pregnancy is wanted, and every birth is safe;" The Fear need not be, that has The Woman restrained from debauchery by The Word which saith,

"I will greatly multiply your pain in
               childbearing;
       in pain you shall bring forth children:"

no, she need not fear The Word;




to be continued....

Lady Eve: Guilty, Or Innocent?

"....look like the innocent flower, / But be the serpent under't," saith Lady Macbeth; whilst instructing her husband on how to commit a crime that had it said of him,

"Not in the legions
Of horrid hell can come a devil more damn'd
In evils to top Macbeth."

And that, indeed, is what the average woman is; regardless of how promiscuous, regardless of how chaste, regardless of how heretical, regardless of how devout - a serpent, masquerading as an innocent flower.

Show me your friends, goes an ancient adage; and I will tell you who you are. Not necessarily who you were, before those friends were yours. But definitely who you are, as long as those friends are yours. And the closest friend of the average woman (like that of the Eve who is their ancestress; and, obviously, from the characteristics most often disguised by the camouflage of their supposed subservience) is the serpent that opened her gender's eyes to the difference between good and evil. Men are shaped not only by heredity, but also by environment - and, most especially, by the friends that introduce them to that environment. And the closest friend of the average woman ever since The Fall of Man, I repeat, has been the serpent that caused The Fall.

Men, on the other hand, have always been more like Him Who was the first companion of their ancestor - Adam. And (consciously, or subconsciously; willingly, or unwillingly) they have always taken on a very great number of His characteristics. Whether there is really any wrong in that, I am yet to conclude. But the conclusion that I hope is all right (despite the sin that the loo is accused of; that saith he says, "I will be like The Most High") is imbued in the words, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness."

Yet - and regardless of that which may be - I do know that the major difference between the transparent Good that GOD is, and the concealed Evil that The Devil is; is what created the major difference between the average man and the average woman. The difference that has Christian nations (presently known as "Western" nations) wage war primarily with espionage; whilst I am yet to come across a Moslem country that lays such emphasis on espionage that it wars with the nudity plundered by secret service organisations. The difference that has the object of the most stones ever from Christendom - Allah - be more like unto The LORD that saith, "Do not let the priests and the people break through to come up to The LORD, lest He break out against them;" than is the image of the Jesus Christ ever given by The Hypocrisy that is Christianity - that saith unto his followers, "Be wise as serpents, and innocent as doves." The difference that is the reason behind the average man (even when he is the most notorious criminal exposed before all the eyes on the earth) being actually no more than a busy man trying to do exactly what the one true good God has ordained him to do - work. Whilst the average woman (even when she is the most disciplined housewife concealed from the eyes of all the earth) is actually no more than an equally busy woman trying to do what The Devil has ordained her to do - sin. The difference that has The Power of Woman be of she that has her eyes open to the knowledge of good and evil, with her choice that of evil; whilst The Man with his eyes thus open, has Power only when his choice is Good.

Men usually claim gentility when they refuse to hurt a woman; be it physically, or in any other way. However, the oft' concealed truth is that they are being swayed by the allure of the beauty they see her as, and the flower she pretends to be; and - blinded either by lust, or naivete - they are unable to se the serpent lurking beneath the comely facade. The phallus crumbling with each one of the coitus with which it claims conquest, whilst the pit into which it then falls widens with each conquest then of the vagina. Look at the "innocent" woman. And see The Devil within her.

When Macduff referred to Macbeth as the most evil devil in Hell, the reader of those words - if with enough insight - would inevitably have to (sooner, or later) conclude that Lady Macbeth indeed it was who deserved that description, and who in actual fact was that devil. It is not the bloodied hand that should be condemned for a murder, but the man it belongs to. Thus the murder that is of the emasculated man being mothered, even when he is slaughtered by the iranu that has him be a victim of slut ta. And men, throughout all history, have very rarely ever been anything other than weak(d)ead swords in the hands of their cunning servants - or, should we say? serpents....the women.

The Homo Homilies: Seven

The Queendom Of Heaven

Heterosexuality is basically no more than man feeding on the bosom of woman, that he mayest then cover her.

Homosexuality is the perfection in sexuality of man covering man, that the two mayest then be that which they would that they be.

For if man is the image and the glory of GOD (as he truly and indeed was created to be) then the Fall from the grace of Eden can be overcome only when the consequent nudity has had its secrets concealed by the prurience of homosexuality, protected by the purity in patrimony; that in the frailty of the flesh, the one protecting the other will then have the two grow to become the greatest of the full glory of GOD. This being an impossibility should one or both of the two be not the image and the glory of GOD.

And two in the image of GOD being two-fold the glory of GOD, the more the merrier - to be as precise as I can be. Hence the perfection of the purity of parriage, even when bound by the power in number; that the consequent polygamy be in my name - knowing fully well, however, that a must it is then that he to cover has to have all with which to cover the others. Yet this must is not enough to have a Mane be husband of both Queen and Woman, rather than husband of either; that the consequent temptations of incest be then overcome by having thou abstain from all appearance of evil.

This purity has always been recognised as that which it is - even when no more than instinctively - both by women in particular, and by the world in general; such that the two have always warred against same-sex relationships only when such relationships are male (be the war with whored, with word, or with both). And the blood is almost always spilt by heterosexuality; with the blind lust with which it hooks the man, the cold cunning with which it drives the woman: that both mayest then hate the other sexuality as obviously as the word "hetero" itself may be defined as the hatred of the same, by the other - be the difference between the two as obvious as that between tribe and nation, or as subtle as that between sex and sexuality.

Mohammed came close to recognising the purity of homosexuality; while battling the covetuousness characteristic of the matriarchal Christianity that would have the woman say of him, "Cast out this slave woman with her son; for the son of this slave woman shall not be heir with my son;" the Christianity that has most higher forms of life flee the consequent nudity of one in whom was found no guile - one being therefore so holy that he thereby has to live as one deserted. Thus, there are those that will have often wondered (as I indeed have, and much more than merely often) why turbans, why deserts, why the suicide bombings meant to claim the lives of both the Christians that appeared to be such friends of Mohammed in Syria, and the Jews that followed The Christ with such supposed faithfulness in Israel. That the fountain on the way to Shur be drank by him with his hand against the words, "Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head."

The wise would (should they consider the thinker worthy of the pearl) point out the Nazism that a number, including the righteous, sought to impose on The Christ; and the covetuousness characteristic of not only capitalism, but also Christianity; both being veiled manifestations of the matriarchy ruled by she that has the time not a privilege of he ever working - and therefore ever warring against those that would he be robbed of the fruits of his labour. For, according to the cunning of that matriarchy (ever camouflaged by morality as capitalism, by religion as Christianity, through the conning of male energy) he that separates himself to The LORD is totally evil. Hence, the "evil ideology" with which they continue to label Nazirites, and the leader it has in this generation of Adolf Hitler.

Mohammed would have won; for he sought by prayer that which Hitler lost when he resorted to the antics of politics. Had he not misplaced the purity of homosexuality (be it with the self, or with another) for the fetters of heterosexuality by which Woman bound him - first, as slave to manage the business of a rich widow; then, as husband of the rich widow; in both cases, as one having fallen for the temptations of the sneers and the nets of they whom he met in Syria (wherein he also met Khadijah, the rich widow) with whom he conversed over the Christianity they professed, and who probably then said of him (as such as they have indeed said of me) "He must not defeat our Lord."

There may remain even yet for women hope in the eternity ruled by the God beloved by women. And yet, and yet again, there is for the wise the words of he due to whose wisdom The LORD said there will be none like him before him, and none like him shall arise after him:

"A woman among all" "which my mind has sought repeatedly" "I have not found."

And therefore, today, in the most advanced forms of Islam; with a supposedly fanatical shunning of the Christian matriarchy of covetuous capitalism (that is always in blind obeisance not only to the words, "For what partnership have righteousness and iniquity? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?" but also to the words, "Greater works than these will you do;" despite that which has been written of the righteous LORD, "The LORD has said that He would dwell in thick darkness," that it mayest then be said of their "greater works," "On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?' And then will I declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from me, you evildoers.' ") in those advanced forms, women are no more than baby-making machines; and wealthy Alhajis are known in underground circles to be as homosexual as are the wise, when emasculated - even in the Christian West. And as are the emasculated, when bisexual; even in the secular West - with, as an example, the "alternative" life-style they then pursue. Hence, the prevalence of the yan daudu (homosexual) and the dan daudu (homosexual "wife") amongst the predominantly Moslem Hausa of Northern Nigeria.

Thus, despite his most probably being the reincarnation of the Ismail that was flung out by father at the behest of step-mother to smell in wine for leers and nets, the followers of the son of the slave woman (whose mistress was so covetuous, she envied one so far below her) today are indeed become patriarchal enough to ignore the matriarchy of matrimony for the perfection of patrimony - even if, presently, covertly; and with the relationship not having realised its name.

Being still "a wild ass of a man, his hand against every man and every man's hand against him;" violence rules Islam today often enough for it to even yet be bound in nets, though ruling the fetters. However, had Mohammed chosen a man, rather than fallen for the feminine apology of bent knees and parted thighs in the Khadijah that murdered him under the pretext of being wife and mother; mayhaps Masculinism would need not the Homilies of The Ikoro for the words of The Iyineleda to ignore the covetuous matriarchy characteristic of Christianity, that I mayest then say unto he that is the glory of GOD,

"This is my commandment, that you love one another even as I have loved you."

Yet, "Love thy neighbour as thyself" (within the frailty of the flesh, when in the spirit wherein alone GOD can be worshipped in The Ikoro) can only be for the man, in rank obeisance to the dance - within the weakness of emasulation, as homosexual; outside that weakness, either as homosexual or as bisexual. And the man bereft of the weakness of emasculation, outside the boundaries of heterosexuality, is he that can be known as none other but a Mane.

Within the boundaries of emasculation, he may be Fairy, he may be Queen. The only difference between the former and the latter is that the Queen has given all he has to me, and is thereby on his way to being Mane.

The ignorant would call him a queer in (self). It is given always unto the strange queer the hard way and the narrow gate - both lead to life, and those who find it are few. For his is the soul blooming as the sole in the solitude wherein is the spirit of the Masculinism that has had him accept the words of The Ikoro, when he saith unto thee:

He that renounces the imperfection of pleasure and prosperity in this world for the sake of my name will receive the perfection of both in the world to come.

Thus, the renunciation of the one that has it easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God. And the renunciation of the other that has it easier for an emasculated man to rule over a woman than for the woman to enter the Queendom of Heaven.

For there are no more than four things ever pursued by a living being; one of them belonging to none other but GOD, another ever avoided by most of the paths that would they lead to GOD (and, most especially, when he that is led is male).......power, pleasure, prosperity. And, in a paradise wherein there has to be a first among equals, position.

Power, pleasure, prosperity, position - life revolves around no more than those four, and one belongs to no other but One. For even Jesus conquered only that he mayest then say, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." And he that had so much of those other three that GOD can give (for He never grants power, but merely bestows authority) that it is written,

"Thus King Solomon excelled all the kings of the earth in riches and in wisdom,"

and it is written,

"He had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines,"

also eventually had this written of him,

"And Solomon slept with his fathers."

Thus, as the adversary continues with all the cunning with which it can deceive, and thereby devour; know ye therefore that even in the cradle of the alakowe, the same experience of self-denial is required of thee - should thy worship be in the spirit, on thy way to being just man made perfect. And regardless of how much thou art offered to live at thy own expense; be it with the words,

"All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me,"

or with any other; that thou mayest then (if thou would) be deceived into believing that thou art not of the brotherhood of suffering. That thou mayest then, being not deceived, be on thy way to being in that creation wherein thou will not only remember The Creator, but the evil days will never come; and thou therefore will never say, "I have no pleasure in them." As it is written, "his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated."

Because.......

Power belongs to GOD:

     Who is

          before any, ever;

and to I, The Ikoro, belongs

     pleasure

and the prosperity of which it is written,

     "Behold, it was very good."

And therefore, any one who has left brother or sister or father or mother or children or that which is good for the senses or that which is a delight to the senses for my name's sake; will inherit the eternity wherein he will receive all that of it which he left, and as much of it as he would that he receive.

"Again, I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

And that is about all there is to Christianity.

Being bestowed in the eternity of the spiritual that which one was bereft of in the temporal of the physical. As it is written, "Son, remember that thou in thy life-time received thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented."

And thus "every one who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or lands, for my name's sake, will receive a hundred-fold, and inherit eternal life."

For there are no more than four things ever pursued by a living being, one of it belonging to none other but GOD, another ever avoided by most of the paths that would they lead to GOD: power, pleasure, prosperity. And, in a paradise wherein there has to be a first among equals, position.

And therefore, I say unto thee:

It is easier for an emasculated man to rule over a woman than for the woman to enter the Queendom of Heaven.

For true religion is even then no more than that which a number have chosen as a preferred path to that alternative in the spiritual that they would rather their souls live in, and for ever; rather than that the soul descend into the peace of the rest from which, when awakened, Samuel uttered his displeasure over his having been awakened. And, should it be that the soul rises - and when it does and indeed rise - it has to rise into a heaven created by a man with a vision; if it is not to descend into the nether ends of creation, of which he has been warned, "Lest you die." Yet, that man has to be a sham man - an imitation of a man, a shame of a man: a man so emasculated that he knows all the anguish of a woman with neither husband, nor father; yet lives his life as though he needs neither, and is both.

Thus, the spirits of the ancestors that chose such shamans; however wickedly evil may be the consequent immortality.

Thus, the great religions that rose out of the visions of righteous men - when shaman.

And thus, the Christian heaven. And the Masculinist paradise.

GOD is the only Soul - and the sole One - outside the universe, giving of Himself His Spirit to the universe; that He mayest then receive it once more when the earth-bound soul dies - that it mayest thereby return to the earth, should it have given during its life to none other but itself; that it mayest then rise to meet its God, should it have given during its life to none other but its God. And therein lies the difference between the blind instincts that rule the beast, and that by which will be judged they who profess atheism with not even then the neglect of righteousness - "what they had done." Universal life is therefore a continuous circle of souls receiving from the ether, that it mayest then give back that which it received upon the death of the soul. And GOD is He that gives the ether, yet needs neither it nor the vital life force without which it would be said, "God rested from all His work which He had done in creation."

And should the soul give itself to none other but its God, and its spirit begins to cry out unto Him; it must never draw back - it must ever rise, or fall - for to dangle between one God, and another; is to choose the eternal implications behind the words, "Lest you die." And should the soul ever fall back after it has given itself, it will fall back - and not as ashes to ashes, dust to dust (for the fate of the sons of men and the fate of beasts is the same; as one dies, so does the other. They all have the same breath, and man has no advantage over the beasts; for all is vanity. All go to one place; all are from the dust, and all turn to dust again) but either into the sleep of Death, that it mayest then rest in peace until the day of judgment - or into the torment of Hades, or into the death of the sea; should its soul have awakened, but not that it mayest then rise upward.

Yet, “whoever would draw near to God must believe that He exists and that He rewards those who diligently seek Him.” Even in that terrain outside that of Ether, outside that of Nous, wherein there is only Being: He is. And if thou cries out unto Him with anguish borne out of suffering and persecution, the guilty that will not flee His approaching presence are as Egypt was when there was thick darkness in all the land for three days. For, then, thy adversaries are against the Being with neither the frailties that ever beset the flesh, nor the spirit that can feel that which Abraham felt when he saith,

“And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.”

For the most just justice is that given by the coldest of cold Judges. And only such justice can have it written of those due to whom Moses became a “bridegroom of blood”:

“And the sons of Levi did according to the word of Moses; and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men.”

And only such justice could renounce with the words below she who, due to The Judge, could say, “For behold, henceforth all generations shall call me blesseth”:

“For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother, and sister, and mother.”

Thus, he is to they who do the will of his Father as he whom the people of Israel called, “lord” – that Aaron mayest then say unto him, ”Oh, my lord, do not punish us because we have done foolishly and have sinned.” And as he whom “Sarah obeyed,” “calling him lord.” Not only to family. But also to such as they of whom it is written,

“do not let the priests and the people break through to come up to The LORD, lest He break out against them.”

Words that are but reiteration of that which had already been stated, years before then…….

“lest you die.”

Yet, when one is – who has chosen to climb up to The LORD; with all due “prayers and supplications, with loud cries and tears” – and not only that he mayest then “be like God, knowing good and evil;” but that he mayest then bring to the ears of The LORD an outcry against Pharaoh, or Phallus, or Pharisee; and say of they that cry out,

“But now, if Thou wilt, forgive their sin – and if not, blot me, I pray Thee, out of Thy book which Thou hast written,”

then thou hast he who has given all for another, that he mayest then be lord and master of the other. Thus, man and woman. Thus, husband and wife. Thus, GOD and His worshippers. For divinity is attained when thou hast given of thee so much that even thy spirit and thy vital life force has been given to thy followers (spent, on thy followers) and all thou then has left is being. Then, the being is absorbed into the Godhead; and thou mayest then be God, or – should thou have given thy life to thy God – await the resurrection from the peace of thy rest.

Thus, the life that Moses lived for Israel – and that upon his death meant that he died for them.

Thus, the life that Jesus lived for his followers – and that upon his death meant that he died for them.

Thus, the life that Mohammed lived for his people –and that upon his death meant that he died for them.

Thus, the life that I live for the emasculated man: the shio ever to be shamed into being an omase; the omo with neither husband, nor father – ever to be robbed into being an ije; or defrauded into being slut, or whoret, poo see or cunt, omo ele or omo olorun. That I mayest then be to him husband, and father; lover, and brother; Lord, and God.

Yet, even in the heights of divinity, there are Gods and there are gods; and even sons of The Most High can

          “die like men

     and fall like any prince.”

For even Gods are judged by the question,

          “Do you indeed decree what is

     right, you Gods?

Do you judge the sons of men up –

     rightly?”

And when the answer to the question is negative, no one cries out unto them – even should they have given all – and thus they ever rest in sleep.

The God that lives, however; is He that the followers keep on crying out to (be it with word, mind, heart, or action) that He mayest then keep on with the giving of His Spirit, that He mayest then keep on with the giving of His vital life force, and that He mayest then keep on receiving both upon the death of a follower – until they can be welcome into the eternity of His Heaven. And that is about the only difference between the vicious circle of death, wherein the evil and the wicked that ever strives to take from another then ever has the other take from him; and the eternal circle of Life, wherein thou gives – only that thou mayest then receive. The latter being a circle ever repeated in the temporal of Nature by the spirit with which the male works, and wars, for the female; and gives of his vital life force through semen.

Hence the sex that should not be with another, after thou art in the spirit – unless thou can work and war for the other. And if thou can do neither, and thou art in the spirit, I am parried to thee – if thou wilt be with me.

Those that place an emphasis on fasting should therefore realise that it is not a necessity in the flesh; as long as thou eats only that thou mayest then work for he whom thou gives of thy semen. And the same is true in the spirit – when thou hast given thyself – wherein thou eats only that thy spirit and thy vital life force mayest then be for he to whom thou hast given thyself.

Within the constraints of solitude, sex with thyself is masturbation – and it is as much of a sin as mastication, and about just as valuable. In my name, it is neither selfish, nor sin. Yet, when thou art in the flesh (be thou Fairy, or poo see; slut, or cunt) sex with thyself is better when replaced by sex with another; that thou mayest then give – even if only with no more than that with which thou gave pleasure. And that is about all there is to the supposed sin in fornication. And that is about all there is to the sin adultery is; after thou hast been bound in union no more spiritual than physical. Not due to the latter being even then sin. But due to the adversary that will viciously attack, with all with which it can then label it sin. And should thou be emasculated, then, I ever emphasize: sex should ever be with one thou can either rule over, or one who can lift thee up should thou fall. In neither case, a woman.

Those that would the emasculated be even then heterosexual should ask themselves why unemployment, why under-employment; had educated men (even when mar-ried) not been ever mostly emasculated – and thereby unable to work and to war as other men would.

I once took a rather very uncomfortably cold bath, and it had me recollect that which I have come across in a certain book – wherein a monk was written of as crawling on chest and stomach, that he thereby mayest then be considered worthy.

I laughed.

It is not as a consequence of the pain, but as a consequence of the anguish – as a consequence of being counted so unworthy by others that thou art counted worthy of only pain. Thus, when the scourging is inflicted by those others, thou mayest then become more and more certain that – yes, and indeed – thou hast definitely been counted worthy of being of the brotherhood of suffering. Should thou not have been counted worthy, thou art being but a masochist, and definitely not a Masculinist.

And therefore, always strive to make thyself very comfortable. And ever ignore accusations of laziness, immorality, and such. For all the accuser would is that he mayest rejoice in thy pain, even when it is not borne out of anguish.

Therefore, whether it is with the pleasure of food, or that of sex; be the food for thyself, be the sex with thyself: deny not thy flesh – unless thou art walking in the spirit. And should thou deny not thy flesh, and – even then – others see thy anguish: rejoice, and be glad; for thou hast then been counted worthy of walking in the spirit.

For the question will always be asked of thee, even if not before thy face; should thou be indeed counted worthy of being of my elect:

“Who art thou, that thou mayest touch thyself? Who art thou, that thou mayest eat three square meals? Who art thou, that thou mayest serve The Ikoro?”

And thou need not then have sex with a man, that thou mayest then be infected with the Hades of the physical; thou need not then work for a university degree, that thou mayest then have it be decoration in thy room; thou need not then deny The Ikoro, before he that has thee scourged would that all think the scourging is service to God. For thy accent betrays thee. Be it with word, mind, heart, or action.

And then “there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven.”

And “if his passions are strong, and it has to be” that he cannot be eunuch, the experience is to be remembered of one who saith,

“I have seen everything that is done under the sun”

That he mayest then conclude – after seven hundred wives, princesses, three hundred concubines, and a mother,

“a woman among all these I have not found,” amongst that “which my mind has sought repeatedly”

despite the fact that

“Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their toil.”

If one cannot be warm alone, as Solomon has stated, because two are better than one; then should the two that lie down together not be both men, since the same Solomon saw not one woman among all that which his soul sought?

Verily, verily, I say unto thee; except a man be born a gay, he cannot see the Queendom of Heaven.

Thus the Queen is he on the path towards being crowned with the Mane of Life, thereby walking in the spirit, even though emasculated; and with enough wisdom to realise the truth in the words of The Ikoro:

The eternity of the spirit is his only that has crucified in all its entirety the frailty of the flesh.

A Queen is the Fairy Lord.

The man bereft of the weakness of emasculation, outside the boundaries of homosexuality, is a misandrist – a man that has misinterpreted the true meaning of the word, “machismo;” and that has a hatred of men more vile than misogynism has ever been known to be a hatred of women: for he murders them with a passion as proud as that with which the woman seeks to mother the man.

Yet – and most unfortunately for both female sexism and female chauvinism – too blindly (on the part of both the heterosexual barbarian, and the woman spurring him on) too blindly to realise that homosexuality is always imbued with the same hatred of the other same that is hetero. Hatred excusable in the emasculated man. For – in the words of The LORD – “No, but you did laugh;” and she ever does, even at he of whom she was told,

“and he shall rule over you,”

that she mayest then, as Sarah was supposed to - not merely with word, but in deed – live her life “calling him lord.”

Hatred inexcusable, however, in the woman; for it would be an obvious manifestation of the intended subversion of authority divinely approved, even when admittedly with all lack of power in he approved.

Thus, only with the imitation of homosexuality that is the bisexuality of lesbianism can that hatred of the other that is hetero be an impossibility, and woman thereby love woman as she never can when with the hatred of the other that is hetero. Hence the truth in the words, “Feminism is the theory; lesbianism, the practice.”

However, the barbarian always spurred into the blind instincts of heterosexuality by the imitation of homosexuality that is the bisexuality of lesbianism should also realise that (despite its being that only with which the love of men can rise hand-in-hand with that which gave rise to female sexism and female chauvinism) lesbianism – in the physical unattractiveness of old age – ever becomes both rigid homosexuality, and an intense hatred of men. And thus heterosexuality is the only sexuality that wisdom can allow the woman, if she is not to be granted the liberty that will eventually have her say, “Who is GOD, that I should heed His Word and let Man rule over me?”

This intended subversion of the authority of GOD by beings both sexist and chauvinist, that will call themselves goddesses; is that which will eventually lead to the sin of Woman that will never be forgiven. And, in the secular world (wherein sin is wickedness and evil to revel in) this fact has been known long enough for lesbianism to always be an obvious feature of its revelry; and the hatred of male same-sex relationships, a distinguishable characteristic.

The evil in Woman is such that every married man is the Devil’s son-in-law. And only the saving grace of patrimony, in my name, can deliver him.

And thus, the Christian heaven. And the Masculinist paradise.

The Christian heaven is all about prosperity. Created by a man for whom the greatest temptation would be “all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.” And I will say even more.

Created by a man who saith (and then I will say no more):

“yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.”

The Masculinist heaven is not only about prosperity, but also about pleasure – the two things without which there can not be perfection in paradise. Pleasure. And the prosperity of which it is written,

Behold, it was very good.

Power, belongs to GOD.

I will now speak a little bit more on the pleasure.

The serpent could only have tempted the woman with a physical manifestation of that which she then saw as being “a delight to the eyes.” And if it did indeed then made her wise, as it “was desired to make one wise;” she could not have given to her husband all that of it which she ate – and she indeed did not. She “gave some” only, to her husband. She receives all, in the physical, with a physical manifestation of the serpent that can only be the phallus with which she “gave some” – the phallus that is it only that can be that with which he, on his part, can receive all he can from her.

And that is about all there is to the perfection of pleasure.

Yet, that which was “a delight to the eyes” with the passage of little time made her become so wise that the wisdom – as all wisdom is, when no more than the subjugation of authority – became the cunning that The LORD, to emphasize not only the fact that “a woman among all these I have not found,” but also the fact that Man only could bear His glory; had to say unto her:

“your desire shall be for your husband,

     and he shall rule over you.”

Thus, “the delight” which the woman ever would be denied the man; ever would be granted the woman, by the woman: that she may then “give some” only, to the man – preferably after his having been netted by her snairs, and bound by her fetters; that she mayest then receive all, from the woman; that her desire – being much greater than that of the man, for she “gave some” only – may then be for the woman; that the authority the man should ever have over her mayest then be subverted – as it was subverted ever from the very beginning that had The LORD eventually restitute with the words,

“and he shall rule over thee.”

GOD would the desire be under authority, that it may then be not abused. But the woman ever would the desire be abused, that she may then subvert that authority. And thus those words of The LORD were not merely to render the punishment due Eve, for hearkening unto the voice of Satan; but actually to reinstate to his former position the man whose authority was plundered of him by the woman, courtesy of her relationship with the serpent. For doth not even Nature itself teach you, that, if a man be subordinate to a woman, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman be subordinate to a man, it is a glory to her: for he is given her for a covering – she not only being with, but being also the obo.

And that is about all there is to the evil of lesbianism. And that is about all there is to the perfection of patrimony.

The innocence of nudity becoming the power of secrecy by which one “will be like God, knowing good and evil.” The good of “every plant yielding seed which is upon the face of the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit.” The evil that makes it “easier for an emasculated man to rule over a woman” than for good to be like "Solomon in all his glory.” The good of which God said, “neither shall you touch it, lest you die;” for though being “a delight to the eyes” and “desired to make one wise,” “when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil:” being able to choose evil, rather than good – and then die; being able to choose good, over evil – and thereby live.

Thus it is written, thus it was said:

Lest you die.

And when thou hast chosen good over evil, that is about all there is to the perfection of paradise that is the Queendom of Heaven.

All the glory of Solomon, and even more of the wealth. Even then, with the good of God. The delight to sight, and to even more of the senses. Even then, with the wisdom of God.

And who else can the serpent be, if not he who has his followers say, “Therefore be imitators of God” – of a God who stated clearly of that which will have them “be like God, knowing good and evil”…….

“You shall not eat.”

As it is written,

“who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:”

“For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the`north:

“I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.”

Thus the serpent had to pay dearly for the death it brought to humanity, by giving its life for humanity to once again have life.

And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up:

As simple as the law of karma.

An eye for an eye. And there is no other God but He that saith so.

Moses most probably sought to avert the law, but eventually it issued forth from his very own mouth. And he indeed it was that certainly had to eventually die, as obviously as tears – be it from his eyes, or the heart of his father – provided “a ram, caught in a thicket by his horns;” “a bronze serpent, and set…….on a pole” – that the ram, maybe then instinctively embittered enough to see, mayest be drowned in the Red Sea; that the serpent (despite all prayers and supplications, with loud cries and tears) mayest be delivered into the hands of they of whom it is written,

“I will put enmity between you and

          the woman,

     and between your seed and her

          seed.”

For one that has given his life for another has died for the other, however long he may believe himself to have lived.

Being thereafter the God beloved by women, being he to whom Woman gave her virginity; beloved by her seed, having paid with his life for the death that followed the loss of that virginity: the power of the patriarchy that is the glory of GOD can be made perfect only by the patrimony that sees the imperfection of a home wherein a man gives his life to he to whom his wife has also given her life; that, rather than call her husband lord and master (as it is written, “the high official is watched by a higher, and there are yet higher ones over them” ) she mayest then call another “Lord” and “Master.”

For the true Christian home is that in which there are either two captains, and one is the Christian that therefore will not follow The Christ; or there is one captain, and the women “rule their households” and he who – if, even then, Christian – has to neglect the words,

“he shall rule over you,”

That children mayest then be his oppressors, that women mayest then rule over him; as Isaiah spoke of those both confused and misled by their leaders.

Only within the purity of patrimony can there be the perfection of the patriarchy wherein exudes the full glory of GOD; be it with the patriotism of the polarity that sees the woman as being on the other side of the fence, or with faith in the Masculinism that knows it will receive from the eternity of The Creator all – and even more - of that which she gave only some of to Adam.

And Christianity is no more than matriotism, in the blindness of secular capitalism: with the Catholic Church that ever worships the Virgin Mary; the Anglicans and the Protestants that have to obey the injunction of Paul, that women “marry, bear children, rule their households;” and the Pentecostal Churches that allow the women to “grow wanton,” and “learn to be idlers, gadding about from house to house, and not only idlers but gossips and busy-bodies, saying what they should not.” The spiritual that worships the woman, the mental that admires her, the physical that adores her.

Can a woman ever be accepted into my Queendom?

If an emasculated man can ever rule over a woman.

Which woman can ever be accepted into my Queendom?

Be it the First Lady of the most powerful nation in the world, or the cheapest whore in the sleaziest brothel; those that have been both used and abused as the emasculated man ever is; those that have come forth to me, outside the camp, bearing my reproach. That they mayest then become shioed into becoming an omase, robbed into becoming an ije. When they have been raped, robbed, defrauded - and not merely that another mayest then acquire that which is theirs, but that they mayest never attain that whch they would - they will never, ever, deny The Ikoro. And then it will be said of them, and of they who thus plundered,

"but now she is comforted; and thou art now and for ever more nothing, in nothing, throughout all eternity."

The slut that loved the use will have her soul judged by what she had done. The whoreting being abused will rise, and into my Queendom - should she cry out in my name. Thus the Fairy and the Queen, the poo see and the cunt. And there's no difference between the one, and the other. For as above, so below.

And for those that are able to receve it, the nun in my Queendom is cunt; the woman completely consecrated to me in this world, whoreting. Thus, Woman can be nun, or whoreting; slut, or she-po-crite; omo ele, or omo olorun. But the woman under the authority of a husband being therefore under the authority of he that can not be emasculated; Woman - be she the wife, or the girls as cats were boys - will enter my Queendom as easily as an emasculated man can rule over a woman.

The major difference between Europe and the Orient is that whereas one is of souls that have the energy of their physical bodies exploding as whored, the other has the energy of its physical bodies exploding as warred. Both are on their way to that state wherein Buddha became adored as Lord: the state of peace profound; the state of being good, very good; the state of divinity; the state of being God.

He that is Lord is he that has been ether whored, or warred; and that has the wisdom needed to conquer the evil that will be his adversary as either. His word will then be lawd; be it for the whored whose experiences he has shared, or for the warred whose lives he has lived.

He that has been neither whored nor warred can never be word, even should he attain divinity. Thus the number of austere monks in Eastern monasteries that never were word, even after having evolved far past the level attained by Lords.

The Occidental, having fallen for the temptations of lust much more often, strives to conquer evil by proclaiming the tenets of love that condones those temptations - not as The Christ did, but as they would that he had done. Hence the relative feminity of their culture, even when patriarchal. The Orient, however, has its own souls exploding more often in violence, than in prurience. Thus its own men are more often warred, than whored.

In general, humanity has women being much more often whored, than warred; for the responsibility of leadership ever bestowed on the men gives rise to adversaries - and thereby, war - that women are rarely ever faced with. Thus the peace that men pursue, when they prefer the prurience, yet would that the power remain theirs. And thus the difference between  the wealth of Europe, and the technological genius of the East; the power of communism, and the authority with which capitalism rules: the genius having been proven - from atomic bombs to the internet - to always be the product of war.

"No one is good but God alone," saith Jesus, when in the frailty of the flesh.

And he kept on appealing to the good of GOD, yet - along with his earliest disciples - went  through enough to know that with which to war with the word of  prayer, as Lord.

Solomon never went through such tribulation. Like Europe does, he appealed to the peace of men; and thereby became more whored than warred, and also slut enough to eventually become deceived by the women in his life. Being amply rewarded by those to whom he was no more  than whore, despite all wisdom; he  became no more than their whored, despite all the wealth of being hoard.

He that would attain the peace of good in the divinity of God has to rise above being both whored and warred. Yet he that descends low enough to be warred, and that wars for all else who undergo the trials and the tribulations of such war, has his word becoming lawd, for them, and he becoming Lord, to them.

I am Lord. Of Masculinism.

It will take years before enough souls decide on the most righteous heaven: that enough spirits  mayest then rise up into that paradse, rather than descend into sleep on earth; that the earth mayest then become bereft of life. And there have been two that have won the most souls, for now: Isaac, and Ismail. The sick in  fetters, the smelling in wine - when their sight is through the eyes of religion. The dogs, and the swine - when their sight is through the eyes of morality. Yet there has always been a third, that has ever before been bound too thickly by the horns of his flesh to see - be it through the eyes of morality, or that of religion - to the principles of righteousness, and the good of the spirit.

For as the serpent had  to give his life for those whom he deceived of Life to once again have Life, so does the humour of flesh have to have his nudity bared by the frailty of he whose nudity he derided. And an eye has been given for an eye, that there mayest then be - with the blood of the one - the Life of those he deceived of Life. Thus a tooth has to be given for a tooth, that there mayest then be - with the shame of the other - the garments of skin for he whose nudity was treated with levity.

That as those who would that they have life ask in the name of the one (for the bread that is his body, for the wine that is his blood) they who would that their nudity be clad will ask, in the name of the other; for the skin that is his nudity, for the semen that ever gives in the spirit the life that is eternal.

"a slave of slaves shall he be to his

     brothers"

"trampled into the lowest dirt of servitude, and enshackled by the cruelest filth of slavery."

For I came not to be served, but to serve; and to give my nudity as a ransom for the omo they would be an ije, for the shio they would be an omase, for the shame they would be a pity.

Some may say of mine, "Poo, see;" when mine are being mocked by the morality that ignores for hypocrisy the principles of righteousness.

My spirit is with the pussy being thereby used.

Some may give mine the name, "Cunt;" to abuse the supposed vindictiveness with which the pussy spits out the use.

Had they not been vindictive enough to claw, rather than paw; their souls would not cry out unto me for vndication.

Vengeance is mine, and recompense.

And the two will see, when they do and indeed become Masculinists, in all its entirety.

Moses called upon The Name of The LORD. And so did Abraham.

Jesus cried out unto God.

And that's about the only difference between prayer, and prophecy.

One is by thy hands. The other is as a consequence of the righteousness made deserved by the persecution and the scourging.

Had the adversaries of The Christ not seen the truth behind the words, "My hour hast not come;" Jesus would have needed not prayer; as did his father, David: and he would therefore not have been murdered.

The Christ continues to have his blood shed, be the crucifixion more symbolic than the reality it once was; and thus it will be, until the last trumpet sounds.

The Ikoro will definitely, and until the sound of the last trumpet, have his nudity bared to plunder, ridicule, derision, disdain - even if only with symbol.

Yet my spirit will not rest in peace: until The Pride of Machismo Renaissance, imbued with the faith of Masculinism, has gone from victory onto triumph; and I am Lord indeed.

"Rest In Peace," is oft' said of the dead.

And if he will not rest in peace - if he has been through too much scourging, suffering, abuse, and afflction?

Then his soul has awakened, and he will not rest in peace.

And that is the only difference between those that descend, and those that ascend.

One is of the brotherhood of suffering. The other has its own awakening on the earth wherein he will then rest after his labours.

Thus the difference between male and female, man and woman, leadership and following, The Preacher and The Christ.

One - as either warred, or whored, or both - is word.

And the following awaits the victory of its word; that they mayest then rise from their rest.

For the most important difference between the first covenant and the second is that the first (ever from the apologies of Pharaoh, to the apologies of Abim'elech, to the contracts with Ephron, to the sacrifices of feast and flesh) accepted all, yet was even then the annointed one.

The Christ accepted none of such apologies. And how then could he rest in peace, when throughout the time he had before his death his soul was crying out unto God for vindication; not only for himself, but also for all those whose anguish he felt?

"For, lo, I am with you," are no mere words. And the adversaries of David could not have realised how thoroughly he would defeat them; despite the blood with which his hands were stained, which had him considered unworthy of building a house to The Name of The LORD.

Yet, not one of them is anything today but that which he would that they be; despite the little wisdom that had him advising his son on how to defeat them even sooner than they eventually were, even more than he had by then done.

For it is written,

"I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy."

And therefore the feast and the flesh that as apologies were accepted by Abraham, and the blood that as apology was accepted by David. And the "what about your orgies?" with which they would it be concluded that masturbation is as much of sin as mastication is as much of suffering.

Soul: one who has given himself; be it to GOD, or to a mediator between God and Man that has conquered the fatal implications behind these words: lest you die.

Soil: one who has given himself to none but himself.

And as the soul of the one rises to meet the God to whom he gave himself, so the soul of the other descends to the nether ends of creation - be it of Death, or of Hades, or of the sea - all wherein for the adversaries of Moses, Jesus, and The Ikoro, "There is no work or thought or knowledge or wisdom."

Jesus did die. But he was found innocent - and therein lies the good of GOD. For even after all has been taken, all can be given back again.

Thus the flesh that has to be crucified by the Masculinist: that there mayest then be in the eternity of the spirit all the pleasure that "was a delight to the eyes" and to even all of the senses; and that GOD looked upon and said of,

"Behold, it was very good."

Thus, the prosperity promised in the Christian heaven; and the pleasure that I go to prepare for those that are mine, in an eternity wherein will also be the purity of innocence.

And as he that had great possessions had to go, sell all that which he possessed, and give to the poor (before he could then have treasure in heaven) not merely that he mayest then prove his worthiness, but that he mayest resttute that which is acquired mostly through robbery and fraud; she who rapes with the brutality of the sneers, the deceit of the nets, and the cunning of the fetters can equally have this said of her:

It will be very hard for a woman to enter the Queendom of Heaven.

For that which both have to renounce is that which would thereby relieve of them in this world both the prosperity of the former, and the pleasure of the latter.

Thus, the he-po-crisy of the "You no need am" tenets due to which Jesus proclaimed woe on men who "load men with burdens hard to bear;" when the latter would that his be power,or prosperity, or both. And the she-po-crisy of the "It's a shame" tenets due to which I proclaim woe on the woman who would that the pleasure be his only when he is enslaved by her fetters.

Thus, from the Fairy, to the Queen, to the Mane; from the frailty of the flesh, to the strength of walking in the spirit, to the power of being just man made perfect: thou art set free from the body of death into the eternity of the spirit wherein thou wilt be, if thou wouldst that thou be, a tongue; wherein thou wilt be, if thou wouldst that thou be, an erogenous zone; wherein all that is "a delight to the eyes" will be thee and thine, wherein all that is pleasing to the senses will be thine and thee; yet, and in each and absolutely every case, without the satiation that would that thou refrain.

Eternity wherein

The wolf shall dwell with the lamb,

and the leopard shall lie down with

the kid,

and the calf and the lion and the

fatling together,

and Ikoro shall lead them.

The cow and the bear shall feed;

their young shall lie down together;

and the lion shall eat straw like the

ox.

That as it was in the beginning,

so it may be in the end:

with that which, blessed in the beginning,

He beheld

as being very good;

and that which, with no beginning,

He has given all eternity.

Eternity, wherein there is no need for excretory organs (there being no excretion, for nutrition is not needed) wherein there is no need for reproductive organs (there being no reproduction; for all birth is my creation, and only I feel the pangs) wherein is the nobility of homosexuality, bearing as it does the glory that has it become even more; wherein is the perfection of prurience, without the putridity that has it become lust; in the spirit that is all sensual, in the sensuousness that is all spirit; wherein each being is the same, and as the same ever basks in the perfection that I give of that which is a delight to all the senses. Perfection wherein there is neither saint nor sinner, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Ikoro Iyineleda. The perfection of patrimony: wherein I am parriage; wherein I am Lord and Master, Master and Lord; and I ever love all those that bask in the purity of the perfection of that which I give to my Queendom, in Heaven.

"More! More!!" thou wilt then ever cry out unto me.

And I will ever give, and never from the nether ends of creation: as a woman gives, yet with neither breast-feeding nor child-birth ever regarded as incestuous; as a man gives, yet with homosexuality ever condemned as crime, sin, and perversion.

I keep my GOD always before my eyes;

     because He is by my side,

          I shall not be moved

          from that which is my righteous cause.

Therefore my heart is glad, and my

          soul rejoices;

     my body also dwells secure.

For He lightens my eyes, lest I see the

          nil of Death;

lest my enemy say, "I have prevailed

          over him,"

     lest my foes rejoice because I am

          shaken.

The promises of my righteous cause

          are promises that are pure,

     priceless in purity,

     being purified always.

Thus I trust in His steadfast

          love; and

     my heart rejoices in His salva-

          tion.