THE
PERFECT RELATIONSHIP
"Give not your strength to women,
your ways to those who destroy kings."
- The Bible.
"Behold, this is what I found, says the Preacher, adding one thing
to another to find the sum, which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not
found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not
found."
- The Bible.
"Behold, this is what I found," saith I, The Ikoro.
"Adding one thing to another to find the sum; which my mind has sought
repeatedly, but I could not find. The world is nothing but a brothel of the
bought, where the woman is the bought and the man the sold."
Be it in the supposedly sacred institution of marriage, the shameless
hypocrisy of the dance-hall, or the naked truth displayed in red-light districts;
the facts always add up to the same simple sum.......the world is nought but a
brothel of the bought, where the man is the slave sweating to purchase the
whore.
And, as in every genuine brothel - regardless of how cheap, or
how expensive it may be - the mad am is always the spit in clitoris that the
far loss appears to be; wielding power over the swaggering of the man with
three feet strong - and both bragging (one, to the other) as the shallow macho
are wont to do, when the brain is buried deeply within the groin.
Only in the sanity of homosexuality can a man avoid the slavery of
matrimony
- be it as the libertine a liberated woman always is; or in the senility of the
ruled, when figure-heading the home. Yet, homosexuality is not necessarily
always sex with another man - even though it
is always sex
with the
same sex; even when the sex is the self, most especially when the self is
at home. For "One man among a thousand" - in the words of the
Preacher - may be found eligible; most especially in the culture prevalent in
most societies, wherein the tradition always would the man be outside the home.
Hence the penchant amongst celibate priests for sex with choir boys. And the
preference that has them ignore the choir girls - however young, old, or
physically attractive - that would have thrown themselves, while ever giggling.
Being self, being home; the attractions of the opposite sex are as repulsive to
the homosexual as sex with an animal is to a man; as reminiscent of the brutish
instincts of the beast as copulation is, when one observes the raging and the
rutting of rampaging heterosexual hordes - however human they may be. For the
delicate sensitivity of the self - when home - makes sex with the same sex a
natural taste, then; that can never be brutish instinct, that becomes an
aversion to brutish instinct - however numerous the brutes may be that would
have their bisexuality convince one otherwise. Hence the penchant amongst
celibate priests for sex with choir boys; even should the choir girls offer
themselves as living sacrifice - as some would.
And the brute is as much in the man as it is in the woman, contrary to the
impression always given by the notoriety which accompanies the aggression with
which he pursues the satiation of his lust; as opposed to the characteristic
passivity with which the woman strives to rouse in him that lust, along with
the rise in her of the prurience that is no more than the female version of
coarse heterosexual lust - despite embodying the finer features of passion,
when in the homosexual. And we see this passive prurience even when a woman is
laid back enough - as she usually is - for her to be respectably "settled
down" as a married woman, as she usually wants to be; we see it often
enough for the successful seduction that is its usual consequence to be no less
proof of her being a lay than we know a priest to be a layman, even within
those donominations wherein his passivity is not as a consequence of enforced
celibacy; we see it always as typical male aggression drives the man towards
her with little else on her part but the flaunting of her flesh, however
repulsive it should actually be. For the only difference between the oats sown
by man and woman is the wild instinct that, being a characteristic feature of
the one, relieves the other of the need for the sowing to be actively pursued.
Thus the instincts that are roused - be it for the conquest of the wooing, or
of the war that woos the wooed - in an instant that has the wooed of the
warrior be as much of the slut as the warrior is the brute, however little the
seduction betrayed by inactivity on her part.
Not necessarily because homosexuality is aesthetics. Not necessarily because
heterosexuality is lust. Not necessarily because sexuality is an acquired
taste, and the relentless pursuit by Nature of the propagation of the species
makes heterosexuality obviously that which would be acquired - naturally. But
simply because of the renunciation that has to be, for "among all these I
have not found."
Only in the natural is propagation a necessity. And, in the natural - in the
frailty of the flesh, when sexuality is added to the relationship - all a
heterosexual can do is reproduce; all his power, that of the rut. Only a
homosexual can truly create. Only he can rise above the rut to create out of
its barbaric excitement, the fine intensity of passion; out of its coarse lust,
the ardent romance of love. Thus, in the words of Webster Schott,
"Homosexuals dominate the American theatre and their dramas inform us of
emotional violence done in the name of heterosexual love as, perhaps,
no
heterosexual art can.......Homosexual fiction and poetry have opened
windows of human awareness, plumbed depths of feeling that may be unique
because of the homosexual's special feelings of isolation,
the very essence
of his social position."
Heterosexuality is basically no more than a function of Nature created to
induce the propagation of the species. What is often mistaken for love, in
heterosexual relationships - after the barbaric excitement of the rutting that
leads to it - is usually no more than the labour it is meant to be. Thus,
regardless of the reward that may or may not accompany that propagation via the
activities of sex, it still is.......
"in toil you shall eat of it all the
days of your life."
On the other hand, the gay and lesbian culture that has infilterated the
conservative family values of modern society - due to the liberation of the
female muscle that is rarely ever any other but flaunted flesh - is actually no
more than an excuse for a societally acceptable pursuit of pleasure, sexual,
and of any sort. For there is absolutely no man (however the number of people
that know him to be gay) and no woman (regardless of how proudly she flaunts
her lesbianism) that does not find the opposite gender sexually attractive
enough to sleep with at least one or the other of its members (if not more) at
one point in time or another - if with free will. And both the one and the
other do so often enough, in that culture, to have the honest observer conclude
that the culture is no more than a bisexual one; as proven by the word,
"preference" - used whenever one is asked by this generation of one's
sexual orientation. In other words, whenever one is asked which orientation one
would rather have, consciously, despite all instincts, despite all subconscious
preference for another. And not - as would indeed be the question, had the
culture been truly a strictly homosexual one - which orientation one does have;
be it consciously, or subconsciously.
The natural inclination towards heterosexuality, even in bisexuals with
absolutely all conscious preference for homosexuality, can be seen in these
words quoted from
The Oprah Magazine:
Ironically - or not, some might argue - it is certain
"masculine" qualities that draw many straight-labelled women to
female partners; that, in combination with emotional connection, intimacy, and
intensity.
"
He's powerful, accomplished, and appealing," were
the words of a lesbian quoted in that same edition of the magazine, of another
lesbian.
The first two attributes (even should we ignore the pronoun ascribed) are
all that is needed to see why there was the third - attributes as physical as
"the defined arm muscles and sinewy body" credited to the
"appealing;" that would definitely be as attractive to the appealed
as whatsoever accomplishments her admiration may use to present prurience as
passion, to label lust as love. And the equivalent preference of male
homosexuals for "feminine" qualities can be observed in the time and
money spent on fashion and make-up other men simply ignore for soap and water -
fashion and make-up that is as much a part of male bisexual culture as it has
obviously conquered heterosexual discrimination against
fops and
dandies.
I have heard before of lesbian women referring to a part of their anatomy as
"sunk deep." I find the term as amusing as it would be vulgar to
those who'd rather not have anything to do with the word, "fuck" -
and even further proof of the obscenity I ascribe to women in homophobic
cultures, who are lesbian enough to be bisexual; and thus with a character
hardened enough, as a matter of course, by their renunciation of both morality
and religion - and thereby made coarse by the hardening that eventually has
them flaunt their lust as heterosexual men have ever been known to. Yet, the
term still is no more amusing than that which some other women - still with an
interest in lust too base not to be bisexual - state, when they would that
others know muscles in a man always reminds them of "down below."
Ever more amusing to me.
Yet, and yet again, muscles in a man - in addition to their own words - also
proves that which I have always written of male heterosexuality, and the labour
it actually is; a labour obvious in the "no pain, no gain" motto of the
most disciplined body-builders, and the fact of their libido being the highest
that a heterosexual man can have.
Homosexual men do not have to go through such pains. Being often
emasculated, being usually as inactive as the women have ever been known to be;
their own energy builds up as libido that the heterosexual burns out as labour,
when male - and even during the sex that he would it be pleasure. And with the
labour of men today, even when heterosexual, being more often mental than
physical; only the body-builder, and other such athletes, can boast of the
physical prowess that is always inevitably accompanied by a high sex-drive -
and that reminds the woman of that drive, however instinctively, the minute she
sees the muscles that remind her of "down below."
And the instincts that accompany that memory roused in women by muscles can
be seen in that fact of the word "brutish" - a word describing men
heterosexual enough to be no more than barbarian savages - being also
synonymous with the word, "sensual." The truth obvious in the
sensuality indeed "the brute force of nature?" The brute is to the
woman what the slut is to the man - and his presence rouses in her that which
her presence rouses in him, as naturally as Nature is said to be imbued with
brute force. And the buttocks is to him what the phallus is to her; in size as
reminiscent of sensuality as the breasts instinctively reminds the emasculated
man of "mummy," when he is not wise enough to renounce the nurture of
the
bo some for the creation that can only be of the pen that is.
Little wonder Caucasian women have always been known to prefer sex with Negro
men as much as their men have shown their own preference for Negro women - a
preference discarded only when the Negro, with the cross that is formal
education, has begun to become as cerebral as the Caucasian has always been
known to be.
But the true homosexual is he that completely disregards (both consciously,
and subconsciously; instinctively, and with all due awareness) whatsoever
sexual attractions the opposite gender may hold - even when with free will.
Homosexuality is thus a fine cross between the lust of the gay and lesbian
playmates, and the labour of the honest heterosexual working hard for his home.
And when that state of mind has been attained - while within the boundaries of
Nature - then, the only other means by which he may be useful to man (and to
GOD) is through the creativity of the mind. For then, and then only, would the
reproduction of the body that is often mistaken for creation have been rendered
impotent.
Heterosexuality is of nature; homosexuality, of course.
Of which course?
The course of a steady retreat away from the beastly impulses of the
physical, towards the mastery over them that is spiritual. A mastery that can
never be seen in the lesbian and the average man, however homosexual the
bisexuality that is their heritage as beings with bodies fully awakened to the
physical. A heritage that has him driven towards pornography (be it as innocent
as that displayed by billboards, or as guilty as a frankly bared vulva) as
strongly as the connotations the industry has with her own name,
lesbian.
An industry that has given rise to connotations in the name, related to the
gender; as obvious as the word "homosexual" has connotations related
to the word "gay."
Lesbian women rarely ever attain a state in their sexuality narrow enough
for them to be labelled truly homosexual. For only a woman ugly enough to be
deemed accursed can be ignored enough by the fanaticism with which society bows
down to Nature's pursuit of the propagation of the species, for her not to
succumb to the wiles with which it makes of her a source of sexual attraction
to the male - be it as a bisexual boasting of the lesbian side of that
sexuality, or as a honest heterosexual woman. And hence the immeasurable number
of times the impression of her ugliness being a curse (even though, actually,
no worse than the bane a truly homosexual man shoulders) has bound in notoriety
the crone and the hag (in the natural; and regardless of how actually innocent
of the charge) to she of whom it is written, in that world that is not of
Nature:
"Thou shall not permit a sorceress to live."
Moses most probably knew those who had offended him up to that point where
he had developed a speech impediment by the time he finally met Him. And, even
more probably, so did He.
However, once a man (in that world that is of Nature) is known by society to
be a true homosexual; he will be ignored by women, and derided by men - enough
for him to seek even further in his own gender that pleasure being withheld by
the women, and to conquer even more with his own work that derision being
upheld by the men.
When one steps outside the boundaries of Nature into the world of the
spiritual, the truth becomes even more evident of the reason some have to make
themselves
"eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven."
For the woman that has renounced those boundaries (unless the renunciation is
not accompanied by that of the ordained authority over her, of the man) has
also, indirectly, renounced the rule of GOD - even when basking under the
hypocrisy of religion, camouflaged as the benevolence of good.
Female is submission; not only when it comes to sex as the act, but also sex
as the gender. And as passive submission is what spurs the male into the action
characterising his gender, active conquest is what lays the female into the
submissive inaction that is the hallmark of her own gender. Thus the hard
muscle with which the conquest is carried out, that even female homosexuals
found attractive enough to have them labelled "butches." And the soft
flesh in the ripeness of the plump, that signifies the inaction of submission.
Sexually attractive, the men would then say; because of a full, shapely figure.
Sexually attractive, Nature is saying, being conquered and awaiting conquest.
But when a woman has renounced her feminity enough to not only demand for
liberation, but also fight for empowerment; she becomes not only Woman, but woe
to man; not only less man, but less the man. She begins to see the man as man
is seen by man - an object of pursuit, conquest, and dominion. He becomes to
her as he is to others such as he - competitor, and no longer companion. And
what does she call herself in those countries wherein this competition has
become more of conquest than a mere calling? The new man. A new gender,
according to those words, that sees the "old man" as dinosaurs are
seen - extinct, even if actually on its way to extinction. And the new man
pursues the extinction of the old (even if actually instinctively; yet with a
ferocity that imitates the manner in which adolescent boys rebel against the
authority of the fathers that were once called "old men," in a
long-forgotten Nigerian slang) that, in certain of those countries wherein the
empowerment of Woman is a foregone conclusion, lesbianism is propagated as
openly as religions are wont to be - even if still with a subtility that denies
the accusation of fanaticism; noted by words such as "sexism," and
"chauvinism." For once the initial conquerors have conquered through
the conquest by emasculation that immediately invites the passivity of
homosexuality; what else is there for the new conquerors but to conquer those
that would have been conquered by the homosexuals, if heterosexual - those to
whom they would then be no more than objects of disdain?
Men that have fallen by the sword are invariably men that fell by the hands
of women, even when the swords are wielded by men. From Potiphar to Ahab, and
on down to Herod; the message is clear - without the woman, all men would
"love one another;" and not war against each other with the
heterosexuality marked by the violence with which territories are conquered,
and heterosexual oats then sowed. Hence the imperfection of the matrimony that
marriage is, having to be replaced by the perfection of the parriage that is
male companion "marriage." And hence the truth behind the following
words, concerning the reason behind the failure of every man that has ever
fallen as such - be it in the physical, or in the spiritual.......
Every man that has ever been a failure (be it in the physical, or in the
spiritual) has been a failure due to his hearkening unto the voice of Woman -
be the voice that of an individual, or more; be the individual close to him, or
distant; be she as dear to him as should have been she who said,
"henceforth all generations will call me blessed"
due to her relationship, then, with him who later on had her know:
"
Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it"
or be she as despised by him as should have been she who (for eleven hundred
pieces of silver) delivered him into the persecution of ridicule and
entertainment, as he stood in the temple of Dagon.
Every man - every single man - including he who excelled all the other kings
of his generation in riches and in wisdom; only to lose almost his entire
kingdom to one of his surbodinates, due to his heart having been lured - by the
women in his life - away from the God of his fathers; that the final judgment rendered
upon his tombstone may be with the words:
"his wives turned away his heart after other gods."
Every man - every single man - including he who excelled all the other kings
of his generation in greatness; only to lose the thread of unity running through
his family ties, due to his having been lured into the sin of adultery and (as
a consequence of that adultery) cold-blooded murder; by a woman who was
forgiven only up to that extent where she could be remembered as the anonymous
wife of he who was murdered.
Every man, including even the very first man that ever was; who lost his
dominion in Eden because he hearkened unto the voice of his wife.
Every man, including the vast majority of men; who are too much of
"more runs" to realise that the women they keep on lusting after lure
them with all due and intentionally deliberate purpose of the serpent's lair
(with the impression of panting after pampering, seduction, or procreation)
only that they be deterred from using that time that should have been spent for
"a
good reward for their toil," that the time be thereby
wasted on "those who destroy kings" - "dressed as a harlot, wily
of heart. She is loud and wayward, her feet do not stay at home; now in the
streets, now in the market, and at every corner she lies in wait."
Being holy and being a whore are not only each to the other as Nature is to
the spiritual, but each to the other as man is to woman - opposites, on two
extreme ends of the ladder.
If a woman had ever been holy, if a man had ever been whore; if a man when
holy and close to a woman was never inmate to warden; if the one had never been
inmate, when close to the woman that wards; if the warding had never sought
confining the truth with such cunning as that which jailed Joseph; if the other
when crowned not been then crowned, with contempt reserved for he-pocrites; if
the one had not been he that saw posing critics being oft' more she than a he:
then one would hesitate before one judged both women and men when with women;
as guilty of the mothering that kills, as the murderer is guilty as Cain.
And as guilty, I do also have to say, as she of whom saith he whose wisdom
had The LORD say, "none like you has been before you and none like you
shall arise after you;" he who would that we all know of her "whose
heart is snares and nets, and whose hands are fetters".......
he who pleases God escapes her, but the sinner is taken by her.
Words spoken by one who would thus know one of the most unknown truths about
homosexuality, and the virtue in it which even those that know usually strive
to conceal from all others:
Prophets have always been emasculated men; and homosexuality devoid of the
bisexuality it would be if otherwise, is nought but an emasculated sexuality.
Thus it is obvious to all those that seek not wisdom in the
"woman among all these I have not found"
who
".......is noisy;
she is wanton and knows no
shame"
that the sexuality of one interested in spirituality enough to not only
aspire towards receiving the gift of prophecy, but other such gifts of the spirit;
is - and should be, "if his passions are strong, and it has to be" -
homosexuality.
"He who pleases God escapes her."
The homosexual always does.
Thus the persecution of the prophet and the homosexual - even when the two
are not in one, the two being almost always emasculated - that damns both the
less being, and the dense being that hearkens unto her words; with the guilt of
the mothering that would she be more, without being the
mo da adjudged
innocent only by the following words:
"I will
bi mo, and thereby be more."
From A bra Ham to the gentleman that saw "us," and on down to the
John that was eventually allowed to join; every prophet has always been an
emasculated man - allowed knowledge of the facts of life only after being
burdened with wife or concubine. And Woman would not be thereby adjudged guilty
by her deeds, and therefore damned by I; were marriage not the matrimony of
matriarchy, and even the liberty supposed by owning concubines no more than
those of they that see well enough to be conned into dying as even then bound.
For what the respectable wife in this generation would bare before all in a
party, or a night-club; is no more innocent than that which a prophet would be
thus consoled with through his concubines - by she whose heart is snares and
nets, and whose hands are fetters; sitting as supposedly settled down in his
home, as a Sarah ever yet ready to mock once more even The LORD; dancing naked
in clubs and night-parties, as Herodias ready to behead him by the hand of
Herod - should he denounce the she-po-critical facade of her supposed
respectability with either the snub of his sexuality, or with the power of his
word.
And therefore, the only man that can ever carry out enough of the work he
was created by GOD to carry out in order to achieve the success he was meant by
GOD to achieve is the man that realises the fact that Adam gave his wife the
names "Woman" and - after the Fall - "Eve;" not because (as
he would that we believe) she was taken out of Man, or she was the mother of
all living; but due to her being Woe to Man, and - after the Fall - Evil
Incarnate. He, in particular, may not even have realised it then - as I hadn't
(of the truth in my words) even when I uttered that which I could not see the
truth in; as I definitely didn't, of the name which I chose (that I may be
called that which I would that I be, in all aspects and ramifications of the
word:
Truth, regardless of how bitter) of that name being actually but
one of the signs by which the eternal approval of my prayer by GOD, my God, is
made obvious. Even before I asked with that prayer, or for that approval: as
can be seen in the similarity my character had, even then, with that of he who
said:
"And I applied my mind to seek and to search out by wisdom all that
is done under heaven."
But of she who is woe to man, and evil incarnate; I see, I know, and I
realised the truth in my words long before I began to utter words that were
truth even when I doubted the truth in them as fervently as Thomas did of his
Master. And enough to see also in the penis, the purity of passion; in the
phallus, the innocence of lust - and have that knowledge which the sight gives
as concealed as usually is the body of she even modern fashion ever dresses as
a harlot, whom Solomon did not find "among all these;" that the shame
never hers may be made evident, when even then she approaches with lust.
From the Eve that devoured the birthright of Adam, in Eden; to the Rebekah
that devoured the birthright of Esau (fanatically enough to wish a curse being
brought upon her as a consequence) to the Delilah that devoured the birthright
of Samson; the story has always been the same - the vagina it is (be it
viciously, lasciviously, or with all the slippery smoothness of the serpent's
love) that devours that machismo which believes it is the one that devours. The
active man striding into the passive yawn with all the toil of the sweat the
yawn displays. That the truth in these words may then be made evident:
Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind
man, both will fall into a pit.
He will roar in like a lion. He will bleat out as a lamb.
The roaring of heterosexuality is as amusing as shallow is the feminity that
is the pit its masculinity ever falls into, with the frankness by which it
reveals the truth incapable of being discerned by the far loss busy wielding
the sword with coitus - show me your friends, and I will tell you who you are.
And if only female homosexuality was the union the male is (be it physically,
mentally, or spiritually) the perfect relationship would be theirs that they
did lose, when they sought to conquer through the union coitus is - and as the
rapists, the fraudsters, and the armed robbers believe is through which
conquest becomes theirs.
The rape, the fraud, and the robbery being as much that of the feminine
subtility as that of the masculine braggado; I have seen the friends of both,
and there is no difference between the two. I clap for the authority of lust
power that of the far loss. I add to the mire by which the woman acquires that
power; thereby lost - and to her - via lust. I worship no other but GOD.
That last statement aptly summarises that which has been the saving grace of
man, ever since his fall from the grace of the Garden of Eden. And not even that
grace will ever save until the tower crumbles inwardly enough to develop the
depth of the voracious black hole that is the major strength of the female
gender, yet without losing its lead as the illuminating sun of the lighthouse
that is the major strength of the male. For then (and then only) can Man be the
lion his demeanour deceives him into believing he is, the conqueror he was
ordered to be, and (most importantly) the image, the likeness, and the glory of
GOD that is his heritage as a man.
He will yawn on as a lion. With a pen that is, and no far loss.
And then (and then only) can Woman be (even should curiosity, rebelion, or
lust deceive her into believing otherwise) the glory of Man that is her own
innate gift as a creation of God, and the helpmeet of Man that is her own
consequent duty.
And thus the examples we have of the greatest of all the prophets, Moses; of
whom it is written:
And there has not arisen a prophet since in Israel.......
Of the greatest of all the artists that the world has ever been bestowed
with, Michelangelo Buonarroti.
Of the greatest of all the conquerors the world has ever known, Alexander
the Great.
Of the greatest of all the musical entertainers the world has ever seen,
Michael Jackson.
And even (should we deign to remember that tribe I have often regretted
being born into; being not only a tribe from which I have often wished that I
be disowned, but also a tribe I have often disowned) of the greatest Yoruba man
that has ever lived, Obafemi Awolowo.
There is but one means by which a man can attain success resembling that of
theirs - ignore Woman. Just as they did. Be it in the toil of
matrimony,
be it in the labour of homosexuality, be it in the purity of the homo - ignore
Woman.
And (were I as bad as the average woman is, or as evil as she
becomes should she dare subvert the authority of man) I would state, rather
than that conclusion, this.......wipe her out of existence.
As the phallus sunk into the
fa ji na becomes a far loss, despite
whatever illusions it may strive to conquer by its image being that of power;
so the
fa severes it from The LORD - with its contempt of the words,
"no razor shall come upon his head;" the
ji rouses it into an
awakening too physical to be no more than slavery in her hands; and the
na
rapes, robs, and defrauds it of the pleasure with which it awakened it - into
the pains of the slavery it awakened it into.
For it is written, "he shall let the locks of hair of his head grow
long." But the
fa ever striving that the separation be to the
ji
that enslaves him by the
na; would rather that it be said, "Does
not nature itself teach you that for a man to wear long hair is degrading to
him." Even should he be under the vow of the Nazirite that the matriarchal
covetuousness of a culture roused by the
ji that has it rape, rob, and
defraud as instinctively as it is raped, robbed, and defrauded via the
conscious
na of the supposed victims - a culture that would the power it
crowns it with be caged as a crow by the notoriety reserved for the Nazi. That the
perfection of beauty, thereby - and even in the natural (as it is proven, even
in Scripture, by he who had "no one so much to be praised for his beauty
as" him; who was known to "cut the hair of his head.......at the end
of every year.") that that perfection may then be lost to a culture that
has the regal nobility of the warrior castrated by the criminal antics of
thugs.
There are only two reasons behind a woman's willingness to sleep with a man,
whenever that willingness surfaces. The one, to stop him from becoming a
success. The other, to strip him of whatever success he may have achieved.
Both, that he may be the slave she would he see her as.
And how obvious the wall a woman is to the man she would be walled of
success; can be seen in how much promiscuity is as much a weapon in the hands
of a woman, as rape has been known to be a weapon in the hands of men -
when frustrated into the rage that sees who indeed is the slave, however
instinctively the sight may be. And also in how often rape is even more of a weapon
in the hands of the supposedly weaker vessel, when a man has been emasculated
into the weakness weaker than that of Woman.
Only when the phallus renounces the
fa ji na to become a pen that is,
can he conquer the wiles with which the woman rouses it into the slavery its
sweat would it be a symbol of power - and be indeed power, as its physical
awakening becomes that by the same; and the pleasure with which awakened, now
with the same; and thus no slavery.
And the phallus sunk into the depths of masculinity thereby becomes imbued
with the power of the pen that is; thereby becomes imbued with the power of
creation - rather than be a mere symbol, in the hands of the imitation that is
reproduction; thereby becomes indeed mightier than the sword by which it is no
more than symbol and slave, in the hands of the supposed enslaved - as a man
clearly emasculated,
and married, is even more clearly no more than
slave and symbol; known by all as figure-head. And all through the giving
always accompanied by the receiving never that of the
fa ji na; through
a union that with gift and receipt perfects friendship with the purity of
passion the lust of its female version can only aspire to; through a union that
only the one has, and the other can not even imitate; through sex male enough
to have even its name ever ascribed more to the male that thereby becomes more,
than to the female that thereby becomes less; through a nurse that suckles with
that which not only nourishes, but gives life - sex which not only cares, but conserves
the gender indeed endangered with a protection that has seen through the antics
of those that seek with sex, slaves; nursing which then conceals the suckling
of the sucking from the
fee she us rape, fraud, and robbery ever that of
the
na that would the slave believe it is the enslaved.
The word "homo" is not only a synonym for the word
"homosexual," but also one for the word "same." And (purity
being that of the same, and not that of the other; as pure white is all white,
and not of any other colour) the most perfect relationship that has ever
existed on earth is that of the same, though not always that of the sexual -
the relationship between two beings created in the image, and the likeness, and
bearing the glory of GOD; the relationship between two beings driven by that
from which the one true GOD rested after He had "finished His work which
He had done," and that which was the first duty of the first man - work.
When two beings are united by such a relationship, then you have that friendship
that is so perfect that the first man lost that of it which he had with his
Creator - only after the creation of that gender that is so wanting in virtue,
its body is an epitome of the vices one is most susceptible to when in the
flesh.
Moses never lost it - probably even before then - but definitely never after
he said, "Here I am." And what was the final judgment rendered on the
tombstone reserved for him in the Scriptures, after he had lived the one
hundred and twenty years given each man that follows with all due submission
the will of The LORD?
And there has not arisen a prophet since in Israel like Moses, whom The
LORD knew face to face.
Even after he had been told by Him:
"You cannot see my face; for man shall not see me and live."
And David (whom GOD favoured up to that extent that none like his immediate
heir has arisen after him, and it was from his lineage that The Christ arose)
had a relationship with Jonathan that was with a perfection of such that it
turned a blind eye to the green hatred of the spear-flinging spite of
Jonathan's very own father. That, and none other but such as that, is the one
and only perfect relationship - for even that marriage which was ordained by
The LORD, and approved of with such blind adherence by the vast majority of humanity;
can be sustained only when the stronger vessel is strong enough to support the
weaker vessel. Like a dearly beloved, though late, female friend once said:
"It's all a question of eligibility."
In the case of the perfect relationship, that eligibility is not a criteria.
Thus the comparative success of the companion marriages that I call parriages,
being all male - and thereby with the phallus sunk as a pen that is into the
generous depths of masculinity, rather than the voracious pit of feminity; and thereby
without the characteristic weakness that has the female version ever with its
continuous need for the stronger version, even when the lesbianism it would
even then be is known as the homosexuality ever maled by the purity of its
passion; and thereby also without its own need as a male to impress a partner
with that strength, and thereby prove eligibility.
The comparatively weak Adam could never have been an eligible partner before
The LORD - yet he shared enough of such purity of friendship with Him that
"the sound of The LORD God walking in the garden" brought fear only
when he had to say:
"I was afraid, because I was naked."
And Moses (temperamental enough to murder; to burn, grind, and soak - in a
fit of anger - the tables of stone upon which were initially written the word
of The LORD, with the finger of God; and to even flare up before The LORD with
the words, "Why hast Thou dealt ill with Thy servant? And why have I not
found favour in Thy sight, that Thou dost lay the burden of all this people upon
me? Did I conceive all this people.......? If Thou will deal thus with me, kill
me at once, if I find favour in Thy sight, that I may not see my
wretchedness.") he definitely could never have had this eventual testimony
written of him:
"Thus The LORD used to speak to Moses face to face, as a man speaks
to his friend."
merely because he was "eligible."
And neither, also, could that eligibility have been the criteria by which
David was chosen; most definitely not by the Jonathan refined by royalty - considering
the rough-and-tumble antics of a man who once said:
"For my father and my mother have forsaken me."
Only beings created in the image, the likeness, and bearing the glory of the
one true good GOD can share the most perfect relationship that can ever be -
the homo relationship. A relationship that has renounced the shallow pit of
feminity for the endless depths of masculinity. A relationship that is not
based on a race that the swift may lose, a battle that the robber may win,
bread that the fool may eat, riches that the moron may own, and favour that may
belong to the hypocrite; and, despite all, may even then have the winners of
the race given the prize of excellence.
"Which my mind has sought repeatedly."
The purity of friendship. The flames of passion. The pearls of wisdom.
One man among a thousand he found.
Among all these I have found only in He Who loved me deeply enough to create
me
in His own image.
