Only when homosexual can he turn the tide on both ridicule and oppression, obviously enough for both to then become blatant persecution. And guilt is never borne by the persecuted, who may thereby "rejoice and be glad;" for "Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account."
For the only difference between I, today (and The Ikoro I am) and Jesus, The Christ (when he was in the world) is the sexuality of those I live for; that he ignored for the suffering he sought to alleviate, to conquer, and to replace with "a place" "in my Father's house" - wherein they are promised all that they were robbed, defrauded, and denied of while on earth.
Yet (and to use the word once more) the only difference between that brotherhood of suffering in particular, and women in general; still remains sexuality - and the interest in it that exclusion from too many others will always encourage: in the words of the Scriptures, "they grow wanton;" even should they not "learn to be idlers, gadding about from house to house, and not only idlers but gossips and busy-bodies, saying what they should not." Wantoness, despite all, pardoned by Jesus up to that extent that he offered such as her "living water" - "a spring of water welling up to eternal life" - and condemned such as her accusers with the words, "Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her." Wantoness, despite all, condoned by the most disciplined English societies up to that extent that the female homosexual (even when as excluded from the world as the male, on the average, is; even then - when the male was guinea pig for the medical quack, victim of the law enforcement bully, and scape-goat for the religious hypocrite) even then, she had her own sexuality condoned by all three; openly enough for it to be with protection backed by written word, in the legal statutes of those English - and very Christian - societies.
Rubbish. That is the simple definition of the Christianity of this evil and adulterous generation. A generation of fraudsters and armed robbers that even now are yet to realise why even heaven has to pass away; as it is written, as it was said. For that which Christianity is yet to realise is that the religion rose out of the robbery of an I that saw too well to "sit down there!" and be thereby sick (as she who has been both judged, and condemned, would that all man do) but too weak also to war as his fathers would; and who therefore had to work the mile with his own war waged by word, and by no other weapon.
Christianity? Rubbish. The robbing of an I too male to "sit down there!" and be thereby sick.
And had restitution merely meant to give, and not to replace; mayhaps GOD may be mocked. But those that ever strive to reap where they did not sow - by giving to every other but he whom they robbed, that which is the produce of every other but they - ever and rather are as the footballer striving to dribble the football. Even a second passing by; and despite then they are yet to know either the definition of restitution, or that of four-fold.
If only restitution meant merely to give, and Zacchaeus became once more the son of Abraham by "doing for them;" rather than by giving back that which he robbed of them - to those exactly that were robbed by him.
Ever since my days in high school, I have known the evil of their wickedness when they say, "I will do it for you." And so, obviously, did he who saith:
On that day many will say to me, "Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?" And then will I declare to them, "I never knew you; depart from me, you evildoers."
And they continue to do it for him today, while claiming that they've given their lives to him; they continue to do it for the weak that are innocent, while claiming that they are giving back to society.
Jesus knew not enough about such as they, when he said of they whose imagination is "evil from his youth;"
"Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do."
But he knew enough, before then, to say:
He has blinded their eyes
and hardened their heart,
lest they should see with their eyes
and perceive with their heart,
and turn for me to heal them.
Eyes so blind, hearts so hardened, that they even boast of being covered with "the blood of Jesus;" that those that indeed see may have their hearts weep over he whose blood is on they and their children. For even when on their knees, in church, and supposedly worshipping him; their own tongues testify against them, saying, "I have slain The LORD's annointed."
From Pharaoh, to Phallus, to Pharisee; theirs is always to say:
"Who is The LORD, that I should heed His voice and let His people go?"
That even the mercy of The LORD's annointed may eventually have them say no more than:
"For we know of Him Who said, 'Vengeance is Mine, I will repay.' "
Believing themselves capable of mocking GOD, they ever mock themselves into being the shame they claim a man is; even after he said:
"Greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends."
For the nobility a she, and the he that would choose such as her, can never see in the You-Rear (unless the he becomes, of course, one "walking upon the roof of the king's house") is that which the God she would he believe is beloved by her would it be his "who is least among you."
And as they continue to scourge, and to persecute, and to strip me of all they can; I rejoice, and I am glad; for so all such as they persecuted all such as I before me. And thus I say once more, with all the authority given unto me:
Pharaoh, Phallus, Pharisee
will all drown in The Red She.
And thereby damned her as the he-po-crite would she be damned?
"What do you say about her?" I have once been asked, with the following words.......
"Now that you're going to spend your entire life cursing women; I'm really frightened."
Indeed?
Am I going to spend my entire life cursing women?
No. For there are those that are neither female roars, nor female sights; those that have neither the camaraderie that binds the former as men are bound, nor the supposed principles with which are ignored by the latter the mischievous antics of such camaraderie. Those that are called "omo," and abused as being "ije" when they have neither father nor husband.
Blesseth indeed is she; be she the slut that loved the use, or the whoreting being abused, or the meek to whom the man is lord - be he then the laze in us, or the "vulgar fellow" shamelessly uncovering himself "before the eyes of his servant's maids."
And therefore; am I, truly, going to spend the rest of my life cursing Woman?
Yes. And indeed. If she be neither ije, nor omo; neither omo ele, nor omo olorun. And even then; she, being Woman, will:
have her pain immensely multiplied during
child-bearing;
in agony ever becoming more
than the torment of the second death,
she shall bring forth children;
that her desire may ever be that she
is absolutely nothing
and throughout all eternity,
until she favours my cause -
my righteous cause.
Heaven and earth will pass away. A heaven built out of theft and fraud, even when with the courage of robbery; is damned by its own actions, and not merely by my word.
When wise, one who is of the brotherhood of suffering will always be homosexual. And therefore, obviously, no Christian. And, if wise, Masculinist. With a sexuality that is as vilified, even in the most permissive societies, as its female version is glorified. Despite the fact that "Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their toil. For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow; but woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up. Again, if two lie together, they are warm; but how can one be warm alone? And though a man might prevail against one who is alone, two will withstand him."
In my own words, "For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow; but woe to him who is with a weaker vessel when he falls, and has not a stronger vessel to lift him up." He will run with the stronger, as the weaker; and the weaker will say unto him (to quote Ebenezer Obey, even if not with as many words), "A type like thee to me. Someone like me to thee. Rather than be with thee, I will rather be with the stronger vessel."
And that is Woman, to be as precise as one can be brief. And to be as brief as wise was Solomon, when he said of he that has another to lift him up,
"If two lie together, they are warm; but how can one be warm alone?"
Words that ascribe perfection the naive Christian will never see, to that which I call "parriage." An imitation of it marriage is, and no more; being (even after ages of continuous changes, and supposed improvements) even less than a mirage ever striving to mirror the relationship Adam had with his creator, the friendship Moses shared with The LORD, the love Jesus had for John. And (being without the matriarchy even followers of The Christ acknowledged with the words, "rule their households") the only word that can be used to describe the only relationship with a perfection such as that of those three, is that which I insist should be used to acknowledge male companion unions.......parriage. And parriage it is that is the perfection in union risen out of the secrets of nudity being bared by the formality of wedlock.
There is no other union in humanity that can aspire towards such perfection.
When wise, I repeat, Man will be Masculinist.
Wisdom marks the sole difference between that which a woman is, and that which a man is when in her shoes. The former will be whoreting; the latter, hurting. By faith, the former may become hot for the God "beloved by women." By faith, the latter can be hot only for I. And I will say more.......
Every religion always rises out of the instinctive reaction of Man against she "whose heart is snares and nets, and whose hands are fetters;" that he might please GOD enough to escape she of whom it is written:
the sinner is taken by her.
And if thou would that two birds be killed with one stone: that thou mayest please GOD and thereby escape her, yet soothe the burning of thy passions, "if thy passions are strong, and it has to be;" then the words of Solomon are sound advice:
if two lie together, they are warm; but how can one be warm alone?
and
but a woman among all these I have not found.
Only in the nudity of lust can friendship attain the perfection of love. And the intimacy of friendship, when nudity is bared by lust; is that which heterosexuality can only aspire to - ever since woman sought to subvert the authority of man by striving to "be like God, knowing good and evil." For even ordained marriage is ever and continuously made even more imperfect by the covetuousness that strives to subvert; right from the Fall that damned she who coveted his authority, even after she had him fall as she did. This, the matriarchal society - and the unit it has in matrimony - have both and always realised, instinctively; and obviously enough to have them condone homosexuality much more than do all other cultures, even with no realisation of the reason by them.
In the most disciplined societies, female homosexuality is always condoned enough to be left to its own devices. In the most permissive societies, it is accepted enough to become the bisexuality of lesbianism. In the first, the male that dares is cut down; instantaneously, with neither sympathy nor mercy. In the second he is free to bear the cross of ridicule, notoriety, and shame.
The Saviour he cannot see in the God "beloved by women;" is that which my God offers him, as I.
For the only difference between a son of God and a God are those that know the other as Lord. Thus, when some say of one, "Our Lord.......;" they thereby speak of one who has chosen them to be his.
But for you, there is one God; GOD, The Creator. And for you, there is one Lord; I, Ikoro Iyineleda. That for you, there may be that Paradise wherein dwells the perfection in the purity of patrimony.
For there is the God of thy fathers. And there is the God "beloved by women." One for he that can war. The other for he that, being weak, can not. And there is one, in I, for he that will boast - if he must - of the things that show his weakness, whose "passions are strong, and it has to be;" yet who would that he be not bound by she whose heart is snares and nets, and whose hands are fetters.
For "by faith Moses, when he was grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, choosing rather to share ill-treatment with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin."
And by faith, I - Ikoro Iyineleda - refuse to be called a man: choosing rather to share ill-treatment with the emasculated homosexual; than to wield oppression with either the wickedness of evil, or the evil of the wicked.
With the wisdom of brevity.......
no temple, no town.
I know that which I say when I say that which I say.
May all my adversaries take my word any other way.
I have overheard once, before, in a public transport bus; a woman asking the Lord Jesus to grant her liberty to be a lesbian. Within a few years after that day, the liberty was given so many others (by who, I have not stated) that it became a movement actively supported by the Church. And I can not count the number of times women have sought to sleep with me; with the obvious consent of husband, pastor, or (by the testimony of her own tongue) Jesus.
The liberty I give Fairies is no more than that which the Church ever allows the woman, ever denies the man. And I give that liberty therefore, that even in the weakness of emasculation they may thereby attain the full strength of masculinism that is the glory of GOD - be it as the living in L.I.F.E.; or as Queens in my Queendom, on their way to being Manes totally consecrated to me.
Solomon saw through the she-po-crisy of Woman to the slut in her, but accepted the apology that asked for silence (though, courtesy of the characteristic cunning of her gender, given only in his old age) enough to eventually have most of his nuggets neglected for the pearls of the Christ.
Jesus saw through the slut in Woman to the he-po-crisy of Man; but accepted apology enough to have the woman men would be an epitome of that which they wish Woman, be forgiven by him with the words, "Woman, behold, your son."
Thus, Jesus did forgive the older woman. Mohammed preferred her. Yet, the snares are as much that of the old, as the fetters are that by which the young bind.
I see through both he-po-crisy and she-po-crisy enough to say unto they of both, whom I will never forgive:
Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at him.
I would have asked that, rather than "throw a stone at him," she be stoned - by those, if they can, that condemn as though they have no sin. Had the she-po-crite not also been of those that damn. Yet, I leave the liberty supposedly that of Woman to the judgment of the God beloved by her. And, from the work always found for her hands by the Devil (ever since the Fall that had The LORD God say unto her,
"yet your desire shall be for your
husband,"
and the "wantoness" that had Paul would that they "marry, bear children, rule their households, and give the enemy no occasion to revile") their own deeds testify against them; as they "learn to be idlers, gadding about from house to house, and not only idlers but gossips and busy-bodies, saying what they should not."
There is but one that is, and that will always be, the judgment of GOD, my God:
He who pleases God escapes her.
All other men may choose me, or may not.
And for those who may find the Ikoro too bitter not to prefer the wolves in sheep's clothing that will arise and show great signs and wonders; so as to lead astray, if possible, even they that I have chosen; I say unto thee:
Ask, and you shall be given the Ikoro;
Seek, and you shall find the Iyineleda;
Knock, and the door shall be opened unto his Queendom.
If thou hast done neither the one, nor the other; then, thou art on the other side; being either he seeking whom to devour, or being led by she that devours - and both will be pitted into the leers with which they devour, sneered into the nets by which they bind, and enslaved by the supposed love with which they would that mine be sold.
They that I have chosen will ask for, and seek, and knock on the door of my Queendom. And thereby conquer, overcome, and attain victory over all the enemy.
And all man is welcome to my Queendom. Therein, the powers of Death shall not prevail against the Masculinists; unto whom I will give that which is neither profanity for the dogs, nor pearls for the swine (apologies to the innocent that bear those two names, whose life I always have regard for) that which neither may trample upon, that they may not thereafter turn to attack ingratitude - that which (if they do trample upon) will render them absolutely nothing, in nothing, throughout all eternity.
No comments:
Post a Comment